Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E. Beatrice Riley

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:18, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

=[[:E. Beatrice Riley]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|E. Beatrice Riley}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/E._Beatrice_Riley Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|E. Beatrice Riley}})

Non-notable supercentenarian. She received a couple letters of congratulation when she got super old... and yeah, that's it. No sources, and since her name is not a likely search term it wouldn't make sense to redirect. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:10, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:18, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:18, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

  • Delete. Fails WP:GNG and there are no other claims to notability. Doctorhawkes (talk) 21:54, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete This article blatantly fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO1E, WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:NOPAGE. There is no policy that the "oldest x" is notable and this article is packed with longevity fancruft about her family and stuff like she could bend over. Her age, life dates, and nationality are already recorded on List of supercentenarians by continent, where they are easier to view, so this permanent WP:PERMASTUB is not needed. Newshunter12 (talk) 04:58, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete – The only coverage this person received was because of her reaching an advanced age. Her age is notable, not her life or deeds. Hence her placement among the oldest Oceanian people ever is sufficient for recording notable facts in this encyclopedia. — JFG talk 09:55, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete Apart from the fact that she was super old there is nothing else here, having an independent page won't work but as suggested above adding to oldest Oceanian people ever would suffice. ShunDream (talk) 21:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination. -The Gnome (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Dial911 (talk) 18:10, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.