Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E.d.i.t

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[E.d.i.t]]=

:{{la|E.d.i.t}} ([{{fullurl:E.d.i.t|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E.d.i.t}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Fails notability/product placement. Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 08:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete, I can't find any independent sources. Thryduulf (talk) 11:22, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:04, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Delete – I cannot find any RSes (using this search [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22E.d.i.t%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a]) that can establish any notability of this piece of software. Creator has not made any strides to provide any, either, which doesn't help us in establishing it. MuZemike 00:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete, likely speedy delete candidate as obvious advertising: ... the CCD sensor is now able to render the full dynamic range from the image and provide optimal results with sharp details and accurate color readings. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.