Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyMock

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:EasyMock}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyMock}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:EasyMock}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz Read! Talk! 04:52, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

=[[:EasyMock]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=EasyMock}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=EasyMock}})

Fails WP:GNG. Has one [https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=5bc635556d2b38ddea03a91a39156f9f19069d2e ref] from a conference paper by author. Passing mentions in conference papers and low-quality publications. --WikiLinuz (talk) 05:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.