Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Condor pada

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted as recreation of deleted material, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilot of invisible F-117-a(song). --Sam Blanning(talk) 23:34, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

=[[El Condor pada]]=

I think this actually meets Speedy deletion criteria but it is (I think) just song lyrics and since most song lyrics are copyrighted, they shouldn't be placed on Wikipedia to begin with. Delete. DGX 22:42, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

::All information can be checked with the index theatre who have a site [http://www.agitprop.co.yu/irp-web/tekstovi.htm] with a contact address. The song deserves article, and it is suspected that the real motivation of those who want to remove it is a censorship of unflattering materials that criticize NATO agression. The song has every right to have an article in wikipedia, this is FREE encyclopedia - free from opression of those who supported illegal bombing of NATO (check what Noam Chomsky has to say about that - do you want to silence him too?) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BabaRera (talk • contribs) {{{2|}}}.

:::Ugh.. this isn't a ethnic dispute, ok? Nobody is trying to silence anybody. It has nothing to with what I think about NATO aggression or anything like that, it's about Wikipedia standards for articles. We can keep the part at the top but the lyrics don't really need to be listed. We can provide an external link to it. As for the links your providing, I don't speak the language and can't understand what the page is saying and don't have a translator so I can't confirm any of this. The rights to the song is what is questionable though. DGX 23:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

::::THIS IS ETHNIC------MOST VOTES(12) WERE KEEP,ONLY 8 DELETE,THEN WHY WAS IT DELETED?!?!?!?!?Dzoni 23:33, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Strong Keep For reasons that I already statedDzoni 23:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Where is the notability asserted? I don't see it. Aplomado - [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aplomado U][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aplomado T][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Aplomado C] 23:13, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

:Try google, if you think this is a vanity page or a non-notable song. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BabaRera (talk • contribs) {{{2|}}}.

  • Keep the article, the song is notable enough. Delete lyrics unless somebody provides some source for rights to the song being released. It can't really be in public domain in Serbia, as that is a US-specific concept. Zocky | picture popups 23:14, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

::You can check with the author himself - they have a site [http://www.agitprop.co.yu/irp-web/tekstovi.htm] with a contac address. Per wikipedia policies, this should be enough - anyone can check the status and weather they agree to release the lyrics or not. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BabaRera (talk • contribs) {{{2|}}}.

  • Strong Keep Maybe fixing the lyrics part,but Keep Jamal Curtis 23:26, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
  • NOTE User has 3 edits. DGX 23:33, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, recreation of previously-deleted article. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

::There was no concensus for delete at ANY time. Someone is badly abusing wikipedia adminship. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BabaRera (talk • contribs) {{{2|}}}.

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.