Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth McCarthy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (A7) by Jimfbleak. Non-admin closure --Pgallert (talk) 07:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

=[[Elizabeth McCarthy]]=

:{{la|Elizabeth McCarthy}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Elizabeth McCarthy}})

Biography of an actress whose listed roles appear to have been non-notable (generally un-named, uncredited and/or in a non-notable production). No significant coverage in reliable sources found, as required for a biography of a living person. I42 (talk) 22:25, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 22:41, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete. No significant roles. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:44, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete The actress has had only minor roles and lacks coverage. WP:TOOSOON. BUT if article author, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lizflicks new] User:Lizflicks is not a single purpose account and not Elizabeth McCarthy, I might suggest he/she request userfication for work out of mainspace while he/she goes through the [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?as_user_ldate=1997&as_user_hdate=2010&q=%22Elizabeth+McCarthy%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&scoring=a&q=%22Elizabeth+McCarthy%22+source%3A%22-newswire%22+source%3A%22-wire%22+source%3A%22-presswire%22+source%3A%22-PR%22+source%3A%22-release%22+source%3A%22-wikipedia%22&lnav=od&btnG=Go 500+ misc g-hits] to find if any of them might act as sources to meet WP:GNG. The common-ness of the name will not make the work easy, but could be good practice for a newcomer. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete; A7 or G11, as this seems to be both non notable and an autobiography. WuhWuzDat 04:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. Maybe salt.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:33, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.