Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma (application)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:54, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

=[[Emma (application)]]=

:{{la|Emma (application)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Emma_(application) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Emma (application)}})

Non-notable software; no substantial coverage. Orange Mike | Talk 16:09, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Delete. I can't find references that would show notability for this product, just lots of press releases, small PR pieces, and [http://nashvillecitypaper.com/content/city-news/e-marketer-emma-sues-virginia-firm-trademark-infringement a newspaper article about Microstrategy getting sued over the name] (not mentioned in this Wikipedia article). I'd redirect this article to MicroStrategy#Social products, which has its own COI problems but is at least a reasonable place to mention this software. Dreamyshade (talk) 19:37, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Delete Clearly SPAM. No extensive third-party coverage. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:04, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Delete - Unambigious promotional page. No extensive third-party coverage. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:53, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.