Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farooq Ahmed Ashai

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:14, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

=[[Farooq Ahmed Ashai]]=

:{{la|Farooq Ahmed Ashai}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Farooq_Ahmed_Ashai Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Farooq Ahmed Ashai}})

Prodded in 2012. Still without sufficient RS. Appears to fail WP:BLP1E (newsworthy only for his killing). Pax 02:52, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:11, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete - I probably wouldn't say WP:BLP1E applies to someone notable for their death, but unfortunately I wasn't able to find much for sources to pass WP:BIO1E or WP:GNG either. I did find [https://books.google.com/books?id=X0QQx5ObGysC&pg=PA66&lpg=PA66 this] but not much more. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 03:40, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep and move to Death of Farooq Ahmed Ashai as is usual with killings of this sort I think this article form The Hindu [http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/top-doctors-in-militant-crosshairs/article5040227.ece] plus the long section in the Human Rights Watch report that User:Rhododendrites found are sufficient ot establish notability. E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:28, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment I agree with the proposal by {{U|E.M.Gregory}}, if BLP1E is the issue and notability of the event is established, then we just need to change the title of the article. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 23:07, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO1E .Thousands of people have been killed in the Kashmir Conflict now each one of them is not notable.This individual seems to have no significance except for being the victim of a crime and there is no significant coverage of the subject and there is no continued coverage beyond mere mention of his death.Clearly lacks WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE or WP:DEPTH and is a ostensible discussion of its nominal subject .Now Several Doctor,Lawyer ,academic have been killed and everyone cannot have separate article merely because there death may mentioned in the media and everyone briefly mentioned in a human rights report also cannot have a separate article.
  1. [http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=-X0zAAAAIBAJ&sjid=4TIHAAAAIBAJ&pg=2848,6433013&dq=farooq-ahmad-ashai&hl=en Lodi News-Sentinel - Feb 19, 1993 ] This merely mentions he was killed and it is the day of his death is a routine news about a death.
  2. [http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-newdelhi/top-doctors-in-militant-crosshairs/article5040227.ece The Hindu ] more of a general article about Doctors being caught in militant crosshair and mentions the deaths of 3 Doctors including Dr. Abdul Ahad Guru and Dr. Sheikh Jalal-ud-din who were also killed in different incidents in addition to the subject .
  3. [http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/INDIA937.PDF] The Subject's death is mentioned in the Human rights report .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:44, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.