Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatafat

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:19, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Fatafat]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Fatafat}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fatafat Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Fatafat}})

I spot trivial name-mentions over [https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/blink/cover/room-for-one-more/article9276367.ece this reminisce], [https://books.google.co.in/books?id=XdbuCwAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&dq=Fatafat%20digestive&pg=PT149#v=onepage&q&f=false this book] and [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-3713284/FORTUNE-COOKIE-New-York-city-gets-taste-Manish-Mehrotra-s-Indian-Accent.html this DaliyMail] piece. Atlas Obscura is user-generated content and not reliable.

Fails WP:GNG comprehensively. ∯WBGconverse 13:05, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:28, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

  • Delete. It's a shame the Atlas Obscura entry isn't reliable, because it's the only in-depth source of information I was able to find. Mentioned in a lot of 'listicles' (e.g. [https://www.huffingtonpost.in/2016/10/19/15-indian-candies-that-have-disappeared-from-our-nukkad-shops_a_21586707/ 1] [http://mumbaimag.com/indian-confectionery-from-the-80s-90s/ 2], [http://www.scooppick.com/15-candies-from-90s-that-makes-you-nostalgic/ 3]) but their reliability is questionable, and they don't have much of substance to say on the subject anyways. Colin M (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment, its surprising that there is no "List of antacids" article, indeed the category on Antacids only shows a few brand names so it looks like an antacid needs to be pretty well known to warrant a standalone (of course, also with plenty of WP:RS), as Fatafat doesnt its a delete from me. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:33, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
  • Delete if the Daily Mail is involved it certainly can’t be legitimate. Trillfendi (talk) 04:20, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.