Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flood fill example in C (2nd nomination)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:23, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

=[[Flood fill example in C]]=

Wikipedia is not a programming guide. Wikisource [http://wikisource.org/wiki/Flood_fill already has it]. The results of the previous VfD were 2 merge with Flood fill, 5 transwiki, and 1 delete. --Carnildo 08:18, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Delete -- This is source material, not an article, besides, see Wikipedia:Transwiki_log Flood fill example in C → Wikisource:Transwiki:Flood fill example in C... --Mysidia 08:22, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
(Yes it is on Wikisource, see [http://wikisource.org/wiki/Transwiki:Flood_fill_example_in_C]) --Mysidia 17:49, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete. This is not an encyclopedia article. --Tony Sidaway ^Talk 08:53, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete - While I can see that the previous vfd had no consensus, I really don't see anyone posting to that vfd who felt it should stay as its own article. Usrnme h8er 09:07, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Duplication is bad and wikisource is a more appropiate place. 09:13, 3 August 2005 (UTC) (unsigned vote by Cate)
If it's already in Wikisource, then delete. — JIP | Talk 10:38, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Madd4Max 11:14, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Delēre. --Merovingian (t) (c) 12:18, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
Delete as per above arguements.Hamster Sandwich 18:18, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete Pavel Vozenilek 02:17, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.