Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frenzyboard

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  23:20, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

=[[Frenzyboard]]=

Advertising, shouldn't be on the wikipedia Jason (talk) 04:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete I was adding a speedy tag, you beat me to it. Utter drivel. Palnu 04:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

User:KristinaMH02 I don't think it should be deleated, what if someone wants to know what Frenzyboard is? Then it won't exist to inform them. You're going to deny someone searching for information just because it's a web forum? Well, if that is the case you better delete anything that has to do with any author/ musician/ movie as well.

  • Delete. Forumcruft; doesn't appear to meet WP:WEB. --Kinu t/c 04:49, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as nn forumcruft. dbtfztalk 04:50, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. FreplySpang (talk) 04:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Sorry, KristinaMH02, but if someone wants to know about Frenzyboard, they can google it. As for other items, we have criteria for each. See WP:WEB, WP:MUSIC, and WP:N in general. As Frenzyboard fails WP:WEB (unless you can provide an outside source to the contrary), we have to delete it. Alba 04:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:WEB. No Alexa rank. Not because it's a web forum. Because it's an insignificant web forum. Fan1967 04:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete being used as a message site, not informatiom.Garrybowers 04:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • If someone wants to know what Frenzyboard is, then they can just go to frenzyboard.com and find out what it is. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for an article about every web forum out there. Delete. --Elkman - (talk) 04:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. Bobby1011 05:14, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as nn-website. --Terence Ong 05:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete KsprayDad 05:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable Kenji Yamada 05:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete article being abused; article shameless advertising— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.110.206.102 (talk • contribs)
  • Delete: "The band broke up in 2003 and the message board has since carried on." That's enough for me. Daniel Case 06:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Deleteuseless.
  • Delete, non-notable forum. JIP | Talk 08:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, if it's important, rewrite. ProhibitOnions 11:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with Five Iron Frenzy, even if it's just a brief note that the forum has taken on a life separate from the band's fandom. Powers 14:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge seems fair, although delete works for me too Just zis Guy you know? 17:23, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

:If someone wants to add it to the Five Iron Frenzy page, then fine; but a merge would imply that a redirect will be created and I don't think it deserves that. --Jason (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

::Whyever not? 'Frenzyboard' isn't being used for anything else in WP, and anyone searching for it would most likely be perfectly happy with the Five Iron Frenzy article. Powers 18:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Merge. per Powers. Bucky Covington 21:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above reasons. Newyorktimescrossword 07:17, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Maybe the information on "Frenzyboard" can go in the band's page, but I somehow doubt Five Iron Frenzy are the only band whose forum is ongoing despite a breakup. -RomeW 09:31, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Merge per Powers, without the commentary, for the redirect (I am a FIF fan). Dan, the CowMan 16:05, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. No merge, no redirect, do not pass Go, do not collect $200... Ifnord 16:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.