Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G&Y Magazine

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

=[[G&Y Magazine]]=

:{{la|G&Y Magazine}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/G%26Y_Magazine Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|G&Y Magazine}})

Does not appear to be a notable magazine. A search for sources shows mostly false positives. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 17:15, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 17:16, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 17:16, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 22:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Strong delete - apparently a [http://gritnyou.com/ one-post blog]. Fails WP:MADEUP. (Note: there's apparently another magazine of the same name for LGBT young people, which gets some overlapping search hits.) Blythwood (talk) 23:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Delete. Like Blythwood says, it looks like some random blog that only got a single post. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.