Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gel-Pak

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

=[[Gel-Pak]]=

:{{la|Gel-Pak}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gel-Pak}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Gel-Pak}})

PROD contested (though no improvements made). No assertion of notability, I made a reasonable search for significant coverage in RS's but no joy. Errant{{small| [tmorton166] {{sup|(chat!)}}}} 15:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete A Google search suggests that the parent company, Delphon, might (or might not) be notable - but this division of he company is not. --MelanieN (talk) 23:07, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Delete Per "this-is-nothing-but-a-really-well-made-advertisement" and "blatantly-made-by-the-company-itself" also, not seeing notability. Sven Manguard _Talk 00:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.