Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Street railway station

:{{la|George Street railway station}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_Deletion/George_Street_railway_station Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|George Street railway station}})

Proposed railway station that was to have been built as part of the now cancelled BaT Tunnel project. Coomera81 (talk) 22:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

:Delete - this crystal ball has cracked.--Rpclod (talk) 00:19, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

:Delete - Its not happening and so doesn't deserve an article. - Shiftchange (talk) 00:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

• Redirect to BaT Tunnel: this is a potential search term, and readers should be directed somewhere if they enter it. Nick-D (talk) 01:14, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
• Redirect per the current consensus on Woolloongabba railway station's AfD. Elassint ^Hi 21:47, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
• Delete and Redirect to BaT Tunnel. Crystal ball may lean the argument towards deletion, however the station may be a plausible search term as it may eventually be built in the area in the future. Thus a delete/redirect case in my opinion. Should the station be approved (again) and eventually built, it can be recreated without the crystal ball history. Coastie43 (talk) 03:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
• Redirect not notable for an article atm, although may be in the future. Transasia07 (talk) 02:50, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.