Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gibson Advanced Jumbo

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:16, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

=[[Gibson Advanced Jumbo]]=

:{{la|Gibson Advanced Jumbo}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gibson_Advanced_Jumbo Stats])

:({{Find sources|Gibson Advanced Jumbo}})

Tagged for notability for 5 years; couldn't establish notability Boleyn (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:35, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Keep. I added some content and sources. The instrument is clearly notable. A quick check for sources would have been appropriate. AfD should be used only for topics that clearly do not belong in Wikipedia, not for articles that just need improvement. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:00, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.