Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenys Colclough
=[[Glenys Colclough]]=
:{{la|Glenys Colclough}} – (
:({{Find sources|Glenys Colclough}})
Tagged for A7 but claims some notability, procedural nomination as a BLP. Black Kite (t) (c) 10:36, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable self-published writer who fails WP:BK, WP:AUTHOR, and WP:BIO. Qworty (talk) 08:51, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*poke* 07:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- Delete: No substantial coverage that I can see in [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22Glenys+Colclough%22&sa=N&tbs=nws:1,ar:1 newspapers] or [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=%22Glenys+Colclough%22&sa=N&tbs=nws:1,ar:1#hl=en&q=%22Glenys+Colclough%22&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbs=nws:1,ar:1,bks:1&source=og&sa=N&tab=np&fp=42f81203ec7070d8 books] (those three hits are books by, not about, the subject, so can't speak to notability), therefore there's no evidence of the subject currently meeting the WP:BIO standard. Gonzonoir (talk) 12:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.