Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Voices UK

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 18:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

=[[Global Voices UK]]=

:{{la|Global Voices UK}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Global_Voices_UK Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Global Voices UK}})

This article was tagged or CSD on advertisemnt/promotional material grounds, which usually suggests copyvio trouble as well since most of the articles I see tagged as such as copy/past additions from corporate websites, however I find no copyvio here and the article, while poorly written, doesn't appear to otherwise be in open violation of any our of guidelines or policies. I therefore put to the community the issue of whether the article should be deleted or not. TomStar81 (Talk) 06:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete: An SME company going about its business, but the awards are routine and no evidence is provided or found that the firm has attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep: I do not believe this article is in violation of the guidelines as there are a range of external references and news articles therefore it should be kept. MhairiHS (talk) 16:04, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. NN. Refs are all social media et al. Szzuk (talk) 22:20, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.