Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Akcelrod (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

=[[Greg Akcelrod]]=

:{{la|Greg Akcelrod}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Greg Akcelrod}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Greg Akcelrod}})

Akcelrod is not an actor, he only played as an extra in two movies not released. His WP was deleted one year ago, when he was a football player —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazyliam (talk • contribs) 08:43, December 1, 2010— Crazyliam (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

  • Delete - Agreed, if anything he's an impostor trying to use Wikipedia to create fake notability.[http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/french-imposter-greg-akcelrod-fools-top-european-soccer-team-cksa-sofia-with-bogus-resume/story-e6frg6so-1225853303839] -- Aeonx (talk) 10:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 21:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete if kept as an article about an actor, as his meager acting career[http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4170889/filmotype] sadly fails WP:ENT. Not being aware of the earlier version where he was touted as a footballer, he does seem to have coverage as a soccer player,[http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Greg+Akcelrod%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&btnG=Search+Archives] but it was only over a 7 month period just this year, and this current article is NOT asserting notability through WP:ATH... which might have had a chance. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.