Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guardians of Ga'Hoole Book 14: Exile
=[[Guardians of Ga'Hoole Book 14: Exile]]=
:{{la|Guardians of Ga'Hoole Book 14: Exile}} ([{{fullurl:Guardians of Ga'Hoole Book 14: Exile|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guardians of Ga'Hoole Book 14: Exile}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Recreated article (see Guardians of Ga'Hoole Book 14: The Exile) that still doesn't meet the criteria for a book article set forth in Wikipedia:Notability (books). Notability is not inherited. Pairadox (talk) 17:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dustitalk to me 16:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 16:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - the article looks to be of good quality and makes up a set of similar quality. The book appears to be widely available. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep - latest entry in a notable novel series by a notable author. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 14:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
::n.b on above concept - "Notability is not inherited" - Drivel, of course notability is inherited. Overwise we would have to say "Farmer Giles of Ham" is not notable "primarily" because J. R. R. Tolkien is the author and he is the author the "The Hobbit" and "The Lord of the Rings". To assert otherwise is avoiding natural logic. Extreme example to show basic principle! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 14:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.