Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guillermo Narvarte

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Guillermo Narvarte}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Guillermo Narvarte}})

I didn't find significant coverages about the subject and it fails WP:GNG Dam222 🌋 (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Basketball, Argentina, Chile, Mexico, Uruguay, and Venezuela. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
• Keep - A google search shows that Narvarte coached several basketball teams, among them Argentine giants Boca Juniors, Peñarol of Mar del Plata, Mexicans Dorados de Chihuahua, Chileans Deportes Castro, and was the assistent coach of Argentina's National Team, which significantly won the bronze in Beijing 2008. This is the link to a Chihuahua's newspaper article in PressReader.com during his time with Dorados with Narvarte's biographical info: [https://www.pressreader.com/mexico/el-heraldo-de-chihuahua/20240530/282093461869583?srsltid=AfmBOorPz8WZT85B7MdU_uQ3D5QU5Lt-MpVTjJ1vu8cuMJcM27wKLCzs Narvarte es entrenador que dirigirá a los Dorados - Daniel Coronado (30 May 2024)]. --Darius (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
• Delete - There's a lack of significant press coverage WP:SIGCOV on the topic, and there are no multiple sources for the article. Hellorld4 (talk) 22:23, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

• Keep - Narvarte is an historical basketball figure in Latin America, he has a very long and successful career, being part of the most important teams of Argentina, Mexico, Chile and Venezuela. I already added more sources to the article that clearly prove wrong the false statement that is lack of significant coverage, I’ll keep adding sources during the week. Merlyn26 (talk) 05:51, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

{{Reply|Merlyn26}} Add sources if you found I didn't find major reliable by simple search and the source that you cite about birth date it doesn't seem reliable.

Most of the provided sources are not

considered credible and some contain trivial mentions that don't meet the criteria of WP:SIGCOV. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 10:19, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

:It is obvious that you clearly didn't take the time to review the references, because what you're saying isn't entirely true, but that's okay, you have to defend your stance. Merlyn26 (talk) 14:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

• Keep - there are enough significant sources in the article to meet GNG. Rlendog (talk) 22:02, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

:

• Keep - A single google news search shows plenty of sources.Nyasalones (talk) 08:04, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.