Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hag (Persian)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. slakr\ talk / 08:35, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
=[[Hag (Persian)]]=
:{{la|Hag (Persian)}} – (
:({{Find sources|Hag (Persian)}})
Hard to tell what this article is about because the author doesn't seem to be a native English speaker, but I believe this should be deleted because wikipedia is not a dictionary. 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 22:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC) 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 22:34, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per nom per WP:NAD. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:38, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
::It is better that this page deleted because the term occurs in all Iranian languages, perhaps a change in the name of this article: Hag (Iranian languages) Tabnak (talk) 20:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
::: Well Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so probably it shouldn't be included at all. 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 22:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
:Contrib Tanks, Yes, indeed, You are absolutely right. I also think so, maybe they can be added to Hag (disambiguation)? This is also difficult because of the homophony and homography in the numerous Iranian and Persian languages. I recommend Hag (Persian) incorporated into a new Page safe namly Hâg (disambiguation). Hâg or Hâj are an appropriate pronunciation for this language area. These words are from a very large family of languages (Indo-European). Of course, the context should be noted. This disambiguation are there to help the mountains of the Iranian plateau are well understood. I am also looking for solutions.I'm sorry for all this Tabnak (talk) 09:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
- Delete because the sources do not support the assertions written in this article and should be deleted per no original research and WP:VERIFY. Also, as stated above Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Please try Wiktionary.---- Steve Quinn (talk) 06:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.