Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvest Bible Chapel   (3rd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

=[[Harvest Bible Chapel]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvest Bible Chapel}}

:{{la|Harvest Bible Chapel}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Harvest_Bible_Chapel_(3rd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Harvest Bible Chapel}})

Non-notable religious organization. This article was sent to AFD in 2008 with a result of no consensus, then again sent to AFD in 2010 with a result of delete. Article was recreated in 2013. Since then, no suitable referencing has been added to the article to show organizational notability. Another round of standard searches also did not reveal enough significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to show notability. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:56, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep article just needs sourcing, here are the results on a simple news google search [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22lHarvest+bible+Chapel%22++&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=%22Harvest+bible+Chapel%22&tbm=nws].E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:25, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Keep It is cited in these books, too: [https://books.google.com/books?id=Nn4kl9hfCAgC&pg=PA19&dq=%22Harvest+Bible+Chapel%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAWoVChMI6f7wroyQxwIVDFk-Ch0FRQYT#v=onepage&q=%22Harvest%20Bible%20Chapel%22&f=false], [https://books.google.com/books?id=BpajmThlbUgC&pg=PA158&dq=%22Harvest+Bible+Chapel%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBmoVChMI6f7wroyQxwIVDFk-Ch0FRQYT#v=onepage&q=%22Harvest%20Bible%20Chapel%22&f=false] and [https://books.google.com/books?id=ER28b7MhlqcC&pg=PA150&dq=%22Harvest+Bible+Chapel%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CFEQ6AEwCWoVChMI6f7wroyQxwIVDFk-Ch0FRQYT#v=onepage&q=%22Harvest%20Bible%20Chapel%22&f=false]. And Adoil Descended (talk) 18:53, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

::Just a note: the first ref you cite was written by the senior pastor of the church, so can't be used to show notability. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 07:24, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep -- As a church operating on a number of campuses, this has the feel of being a denomination, rather than a local church. I note that it is called a "megachurch". If that is right I would suggest that it is notable, though it is difficult to tell when no statistics are provided. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:51, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.