Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heron programming language
This discussion is now closed, and Heron programming language was kept, as no consensus was reached. In all, I count 15 delete votes and somewhere between 9 and 13 keep votes, depending on which votes are counted; in any event it's clear there was not consensus, neither in the first round of voting nor in the second round. -- Further edits to this page will probably be ignored. Wile E. Heresiarch 08:15, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
----
Re: Heron programming language
-----
Pseudo-ToC
(since headings & hence real ToC not premissible in material for transclusion)
----
- Pseudo-ToC
- Original Discussion and Voting
- Disputed Discussion and Voting, after Time Limit
- Isn't this Resumed Voting Illegitimate?
- Statement from User:Francs2000 [and responses]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Original Discussion and Voting
-----
{{Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Heron programming language/Original phase}}
----
Disputed Discussion and Voting after Time Limit
----
{{Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Heron programming language/Disputed phase}}
----
Isn't this Resumed Voting Illegitimate?
----
This and the next pseudo-section have been moved to become the start of
Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Specifics Moved from VfD Discussion of Heron programming language, a page dedicated to policy issues like those that have been raised here. --Jerzy(t) 07:35, 2004 Jul 21 (UTC)
----
Statement from User:Francs2000 [and responses]
----
This and the preceding pseudo-section have been moved to become the start of
Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Specifics Moved from VfD Discussion of Heron programming language, a page dedicated to policy issues like those that have been raised here. --Jerzy(t) 07:35, 2004 Jul 21 (UTC)
----
----
The force of further discussion of this page's topic, possible deletion of Heron programming language, is in some doubt.
Expressions of concern about such doubt are more appropriate withinWikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Proposed/Evolving Policy for Exceeding 5 Days on VfD than here.
Notice should appear here once any doubt ends.
--Jerzy(t) 07:35, 2004 Jul 21 (UTC)
- Please keep. It is nice to have comprehensive information on programming languages in Wikipedia. But for the god' sake, do not delete articles on historical programming languages mentioned in the discussion. For example JOSS article was very usefull to me and I was very happy when i found it in Wikipedia (by mere chance, if i had remembered the name, i could google for it)--Kyknos 23:27, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC).