Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hezekiah Jubilee Calendar

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:15, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

=[[Hezekiah Jubilee Calendar]]=

:{{la|Hezekiah Jubilee Calendar}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Hezekiah Jubilee Calendar}})

Blatant original research, probably containing significant amount of nonsense; whatever it is, it most certainly does not date back to anywhere near Hezekiah of Judah... --- AnonMoos (talk) 10:38, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Agree that it appears to be original research, and seems to fail WP:SOAP. ClaretAsh (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia is not the place to publish your cockamamie theory. Mangoe (talk) 17:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete because I simply can't agree that "The graphic was copied from a very ancient Hebrew book found in the Drew University library many years ago with the resulting loss of the citation" is a valid reference to a reliable source, and also for reasons too many to list but hinted at by AnonMoos, ClaretAsh and Mangoe above. Whew! Also, we have the excellent article Hebrew calendar, which is well-referenced and describes in detail what the reliable sources say about the actual topic, not fantasies about the topic. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete as original research, and badly done at that. First Light (talk) 04:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 18:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 18:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.