Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human (3rd nomination)
=[[Human]]=
{{humor}}
:{{la|Human}} – (
:({{Find sources|2013}})
- Extermenly Violates WP:CONFLICT, no external sources found which have not been written by anyone else outside of this race. --TitanOne (talk) 01:53, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Keep Enough [http://www.mypetcaptions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/wikipedia-lolcat1.jpg research] has not been done by the nominator. Clearly does not violate WP:COI.—indopug (talk) 02:29, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Notable species, 6 billion specimens, what more can you ask for? You want 7 billion specimens? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- If we'll base it from the lifecount within that planet, 6 billion humans are a minority compared to approximately 800 Septillion Ants and 50 Sextillion Cockroaches. --TitanOne (talk) 04:02, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete WP:COATRACK -- smushes together a number of topics, WP:SYNTHESIS -- smushes together a number of species, WP:COI -- no independent references, WP:NOTABILITY -- all sources published by subject ' 65.93.12.101 (talk) 03:39, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per indopug. --Physics is all gnomes (talk) 12:15, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to man Heard of man, but "human" refers to a hu-man, so who(hu)? Hydriz (talk) 14:55, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Redirect as a common misspelling of "Hugh Man" to List of one-time characters in Futurama, add sources from [http://theinfosphere.org/Hugh_Man]. Dennis Brown (talk) 16:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:ROC, how are humans relevant?--Ezekiel 7:19 †Go Buffalo! (sign)† 18:00, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.