Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'll Be Home for Christmas – EP

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Failure by those in favour of keeping this article to assert their claims of notability with reliable sources. Arguments like "it was in promotion of her Christmas tour" don't cut it. PeterSymonds (talk) 17:28, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[I'll Be Home for Christmas – EP]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'll Be Home for Christmas – EP}}

:{{la|I'll Be Home for Christmas – EP}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'll Be Home for Christmas – EP}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|I'll Be Home for Christmas – EP}})

No secondary sources found. Sara Evans is notable, RCA Records is notable. This is a four-song EP which did not chart, was not reviewed professionally, and is available only through digital retailers. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 22:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 00:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

:Keep; it can be added to the article that it was in promotion of her Christmas tour. CloversMallRat (talk) 04:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Keep Part of her discography-the rest of which have their own pages-and should be kept, at the very least, for the sake of completion. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 04:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:NALBUM. Neither a tour tie-in nor satisfying completionists are valid reasons for keeping this article. TheJazzDalek (talk) 12:16, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Simply fails WP:NALBUM. None of the above reasons to keep are valid to per Wikipedia policy or guidelines. Rehevkor ✉ 14:11, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Clovers added two sources, both blogs. Blogs for networks like CMT and GAC are fine in association with other sources, but here there are no other sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:10, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.