Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-ology

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:15, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[I-ology]]=

:{{la|I-ology}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-ology}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|I-ology}})

Part of a four article walled-garden. This was prodded as being promotional over a month ago but the prod was recently disputed. The subject fails our general notability guideline because it has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Note that the related articles Woody Woodward, Law of Importance and Emotional fingerprint are also at AfD. Them From Space 10:53, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete as non-notable and unverifiable. The only sources I can find that relate to the film are closely associated with its producers or subjects. (Not to be confused with Iology, a web marketing firm.) Cnilep (talk) 19:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Redirect to the Woody Woodward (businessman and author), as that article might have a slim chance of showing notability, while this film one does not. I do understand that if the Woodward article is deleted, my redirect opinion will be moot. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:15, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.