Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idiot's Guide to Ballroom Dancing
=[[Idiot's Guide to Ballroom Dancing]]=
:{{la|Idiot's Guide to Ballroom Dancing}} – (
:({{Find sources|Idiot's Guide to Ballroom Dancing}})
Beyond WP:SCOPE. John Vandenberg (chat) 18:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - What makes this book notable for inclusion? CycloneGU (talk) 18:21, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - I'm not even sure this is a book review - it just looks like some random facts. Some of this information, if sourced could be added to the ballroom dancing article, but as is, this is not an encyclopedia article. Nwlaw63 (talk) 18:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - not enough context, but seems to be a :WP:NOT#HOWTO violation. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:46, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. The talk page for the article makes it seem like the article creator was attempting to create an article about a book, but this book just isn't notable enough for its own article. Rnb (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, in addition to above, this pretty much comes across as blatant nonsense. Daniel Case (talk) 07:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Probably a book in "Complete Idiot's Guides" series ([http://idiotsguides.com/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0,,9781592575770,00.html this specific book in fact]), which come out at the frequency of about 40 books a year, and this article reads like one of the back appendices, which would meet WP:COPYVIO if it was confirmed. Nate • (chatter) 10:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - No indication of notability . -- Joaquin008 (talk) 14:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.