Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Credit Insurance & Surety Association
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 00:51, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
=[[:International Credit Insurance & Surety Association]]=
:{{la|1=International Credit Insurance & Surety Association}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=International Credit Insurance & Surety Association}})
Lacks refs to establish notablility. Tagged for over 10 years - Altenmann >talk 00:50, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Organizations, and Netherlands. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:23, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Tiny organization. Seems confused about the "Netherlands". gidonb (talk) 05:56, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks proper sources. Is sourced from their own website. killer bee 06:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete obvious WP:ADVERT and likely not WP:NCORP passing. Graywalls (talk) 09:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. This is a WP:BROCHURE. —siroχo 10:28, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
:* Keep. There are sources to support the notability of the organization. See [https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/guide-to-trade-credit-insurance/introduction/841AC3BFDF41E25A53A4C76977C2AD92 here]. The reports published by ICISA are considered relevant, see [https://www.gtreview.com/news/global/trade-credit-insurance-reaches-just-13-of-insured-shipments-icisa/ here] and [https://insuranceasia.com/insurance/news/global-trade-credit-insurance-market-reaches-14b-in-2022-icisa here]. True, the article as it stands is promotional, not encyclopedic, etc. But the organization is notable.
:Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 22:04, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete not properly sourced with reliable independent of the subject sources. In its current form, it resembles a brochure, as someone previously noted. --BoraVoro (talk) 10:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.