Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's Alright It's OK

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ashley Tisdale. Fritzpoll (talk) 12:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[It's Alright It's OK]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's Alright It's OK}}

:{{la|It's Alright It's OK}} ([{{fullurl:It's Alright It's OK|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's Alright It's OK}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

:{{la|It's Alright, It's OK}} ([{{fullurl:It's Alright, It's OK|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's Alright It's OK}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Never charted. Not covered by multiple artists. Has won no awards. Unreleased. Fails WP:NSONGS and WP:CRYSTAL —Kww(talk) 13:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

::*Note that article has been renamed since AFD has begun—Kww(talk) 23:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Delete - Non-notable song fails WP:MUSIC#SONGS. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete - nominator says it all. JohnCD (talk) 16:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to Ashley Tisdale. The single is going to be released yet and there's no sufficient information to keep the article. But, the single was already announced so the article will be re-created several times, so I think that a redirect would be great. Decodet (talk) 18:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Merge and redirect to Ashley Tisdale discography, there is insufficient material for a separate article. - Mgm|^(talk) 19:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC#Songs. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 01:09, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete: notability of song not established WP:CRYSTAL. JamesBurns (talk) 03:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to Ashley Tisdale. AshleyMusic.com get for us more informations about this album very soon. It's not necessary delete the article, just redirect it. When sufficient informations to keep the article comes available, we can just revert the redirect. Juanacho (talk) 10:37, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Redirect, but it'll be back as a notable article within a month, I'm sure. Esteffect (talk) 16:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep per above. Notability is a question of five weeks or whatever. No need to annoy the article creator now. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 06:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete the nom pretty much sums it up. Themfromspace (talk) 04:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
REdirect as per User:Decodet Power.corrupts (talk) 09:02, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.