Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack O'Donnell (lobbyist)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Jack O'Donnell (lobbyist)}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack O'Donnell (lobbyist)}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Jack O'Donnell (lobbyist)}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 23:59, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
=[[:Jack O'Donnell (lobbyist)]]=
:{{la|Jack O'Donnell (lobbyist)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Jack O'Donnell (lobbyist)}})
State-level lobbyist and political operative fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. January 2021 edits indicate likely WP:COI and WP:PROMO issues. KidAd • SPEAK 22:41, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:53, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
delete absent better sourcing. Spartaz Humbug! 17:27, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.