Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James O'Dea (actor)

=[[James O'Dea (actor)]]=

:{{la|James O'Dea (actor)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_O%27Dea_(actor) Stats])

:({{Find sources|James O'Dea (actor)}})

Completely non-notable. Beerest355 Talk 22:52, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete. His body of work is just too small and unnotable. Time to call it O'Dea. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:29, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

::I would hardly call his brief Blue Heelers role notable. Three episodes? Out of 510? Beerest355 Talk 20:06, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

::::Additionally, when you talk about WP;REFUND, you are talking about a person who could potentially become more notable. I'm not seeing this with him. His roles were 2002-2004 and he doesn't seem to be active anymore. SOXROX (talk) 22:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Delete. Per nom and Clarityfiend's arguments.Completely non notable actor. Finnegas (talk) 14:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.