Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Taylor-Foster

:{{la|James Taylor-Foster}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_Taylor-Foster Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|James Taylor-Foster}})

I have added a couple of references, but am not seeing the amount of coverage needed to make this architectural writer notable. Tacyarg (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 18:50, 22 April 2018 (UTC)

• Weak Keep it's not overwhelming but I'm seeing some coverage of his talks and scholarship such as [https://books.google.com/books?id=k25HCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT209&dq="James+Taylor-Foster"&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjso6qs4c7aAhUKwlkKHV5aCyIQ6AEIRjAG#v=onepage&q="James%20Taylor-Foster"&f=false here]. Alternatively merging to ArchDaily would be a reasonable outcome. Is he the one who wrote the the 2011 book on Monet color and impressionism? FloridaArmy (talk) 20:55, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
• Delete - he wrote a book. He has a job. There is no indication of notability. Wikipedia is not a directory.--Rpclod (talk) 00:44, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.