Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jefferson Place

Advert and Not Notable - Google search comes up with mostly addresses. Speedy Delete. VegaDark 10:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

:Speedy delete? See, this is one of the reasons nominators voting sucks. Sometimes the votes make no sense. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

::It seems to fit the article 7 criteria for a speedy delete, does it not? VegaDark 11:45, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

:::No, I don't believe it does. And if it were a speedy, why did you go to AfD instead of tagging for speedy? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 12:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

::::I figured there was room to argue if it met the speedy delete criteria or not (although I personally feel that it does), so I just put it through this so people could add their input. VegaDark 03:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

:::::If you tag an article as speedy and it isn't, then the worst that will happen is an admin will come along and remove the tag. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 04:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

:::::::Not quite. The worst that will happen is that the article will be deleted, and if it's not on a watchlist, it's probably gone for good. That said, this embarrassment of an article ought to be speediable. Denni ☯ 03:20, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

::::::Noted. Next time I'll do that. VegaDark 04:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

• That said, I agree with delete. This article is hopelessly unencyclopaedic and we're really better off without it. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 11:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, advert. PJM 13:08, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, advert --Quarl 22:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per PJM --NaconKantari 03:18, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.