Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Concha (writer)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 03:19, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

=[[Jessica Concha (writer)]]=

:{{la|Jessica Concha (writer)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jessica_Concha_(writer) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Jessica Concha (writer)}})

BLP(Author) Article fails WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR. A speedy deletion has already been declined. Notable works seem to point to films or disamb. pages. Only two books, first published in 2013. scope_creep talk 2:45, 26 July 2 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete or userfy. From what I can see, she does have a fanbase out there but has yet to actually gain the mainstream coverage that we require for authors. I wish I could say that she's received the coverage necessary since one of her books has a character with a similar first name as mine, but the coverage just isn't here. There's a fanbase, but we can't base notability on an author's popularity, as that only makes it more likely that someone will gain coverage but isn't a guarantee. No problem with someone wanting to userfy the content, though. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 01:04, 28 July 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 15:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)


:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.