Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Riffel

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[Jim Riffel]]=

:{{la|Jim Riffel}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Jim Riffel}})

No non-trivial sources. Award wins are trivial, just proving how meaningless the phrase "award winning" has become. Utterly fails notability for BLPs. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 17:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:37, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Delete per being blatant WP:ADVERT and as failing WP:CREATIVE and WP:BLP. Just with the deleted article on his recent film project, the article includes only two sources... one to a deadlink to Daily Record article,[http://www.dailyrecord.com/apps/pbcs.dll/articleAID=2010101210081], and the other to an unrelated PhillyBurbs article.[http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/news_details/article/157/2010/december/15/area-filmmakers-woo-big-names-and-offer-big-bucks-for-charity.html/] Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Fails WP:CREATIVE. Neither the filmmaker nor his work have non-trivial coverage by reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.