Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnathan Bagley

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:25, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Johnathan Bagley]]=

:{{la|Johnathan Bagley}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Johnathan_Bagley Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Johnathan Bagley}})

Non-notable snooker player. As the article itself explains, he had little success as a pro (see [http://www.snookerdatabase.co.uk/PlayerDetails.aspx?playerKey=340 this link]) with a claimed career winnings of £475. More recently, he's had some success (no wins though) as part of the World Seniors Tour, a much lesser level of competition that, in turn, generates very little coverage in reliable sources. Thus, Bagley does not currently meet the requirements of WP:NSPORT, of the specific guideline for cue sports or of WP:GNG. Pichpich (talk) 20:37, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 20:37, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 20:37, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rollidan (talk) 04:41, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

:Keep - He totally meets WP:NSPORT, "People who have competed at the fully professional level of a sport," which he has, as he qualified for the snooker tour as it says in the article for two seasons. The career winnings is only from professional tournaments. Longstanding notability is that snooker players that have qualified for the tour are notable. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:26, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Delete Not every fully professional sportsperson is notable. We need sourcing, which is lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep Participating in the world championships makes one notable generally, no reason to make an exception here. Smartyllama (talk) 23:39, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:29, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Delete: Although he might just meet the subject-specific guideline, that just exists to establish a presumption that good sources either already exist or might be found. This article just gives two database-type entries that don't even remotely meet the "significant coverage" hurdle. Wikipedia doesn't need to have an article about everyone who has ever participated in any world championship of any sport. --Slashme (talk) 09:09, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Delete. Zero secondary sources exist, there is only directory information. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
Secondary source - http://www.thecueview.com/bagley-qualifies-for-world-seniors.html146.198.35.85 (talk) 22:12, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.