Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Goldberg
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 23:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
=[[:Jonathan Goldberg]]=
:{{la|Jonathan Goldberg}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Jonathan Goldberg}})
fails WP:GNG ItsKesha (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ItsKesha (talk) 09:55, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Snow keep. Subject clearly meets WP:NPROF C1 (with a huge number of citations in a lower citation field) and C5 (with named chairs at both Johns Hopkins and Emory). Russ Woodroofe (talk) 11:14, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, with an [https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=w6cQiegAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao h-index of 38] he easily passes NSCHOLAR#1 on citations.--Eostrix (🦉 hoot hoot🦉) 14:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 May 29. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Snow keep. clearly a failure to do WP:BEFORE since the subject passes WP:NPROF without question. --hroest 15:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Snow keep. Also many many book reviews (I added some for his first three books, stopping before getting to the rest) give him an easy pass of WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.