Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Staples
=[[Ken Staples]]=
:{{la|Ken Staples}} – (
:({{Find sources|Ken Staples}})
Potentially non-notable minor league baseball player and manager. Just what does a minor league manager need to do to merit an article? This one led his teams to three straight league championship victories. However, as a whole he didn't manage that many games. As a player, he hit only .264. What do you think? Should Ken Staples stay or go? Alex (talk) 20:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep But only if relevant third-party sources can be found and added. Google News archive has quite a few hits on him, especially in the 50's and the 90's (including the New York Times), but because the entirety of said articles were pay-per-view I have not added them to the article. - SudoGhost (talk) 00:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Keep .. he was fairly successful as a manager and sources are probably out there. Spanneraol (talk) 17:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing that would qualify as notable. There were mentions of him on Google news [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22ken+staples%22&scoring=a&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=1950&as_hdate=1959&lnav=hist1] and [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22ken+staples%22&scoring=a&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=1990&as_hdate=1999&lnav=hist5], but nothing that would add to notability. Worth a prominent mention in St. Cloud Rox, the Class A team that he managed, but that's about it. Mandsford 14:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- In that case, a redirect to the section of the team article discussing him would seem appropriate. Rlendog (talk) 16:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.