Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kento Nagayama

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

=[[Kento Nagayama]]=

:{{la|Kento Nagayama}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kento Nagayama}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Kento Nagayama}})

Unsourced BLP. Previous prod was removed without sourcing. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 15:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Delete as article fails notability criteria for actors. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 23:11, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

:({{Find sources|永山絢斗}}

Keep per apparently meeting WP:ENT and seek input from Japanese-language-reading Wikipedians. An expectation for English language sources for a non-Western actor is both unrealistic and not what Wikipedia is all about. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:40, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Keep per WP:ENT. Doc Quintana (talk) 00:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete as an unsourced BLP who fails the notability guidelines. Also, this is an English encyclopedia. Japanese sources shouldn't be used. Nolelover 21:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.