Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/King Martha

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗plicit 23:29, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

=[[:King Martha]]=

:{{la|1=King Martha}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=King Martha}})

Band's article is up for deletion; looking at their albums, most don't seem notable. This one as well only has streaming sites, or places to purchase a copy. Non-notable album. Oaktree b (talk) 19:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and England. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:18, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Delete - for the same reason as their other albums that have recently been nominated. This album has a brief review at AllMusic (already cited), which helps a little, but I can find nothing else to indicate that the album was noticed by anyone else in the music media. Do not redirect to the band because they may also be deleted; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ist (band). ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:28, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

::Comment - The band's article has now been deleted after the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ist (band). Under most interpretations of WP:A9, if the band is not notable than neither are their albums. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.