Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kirisute Gomen

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Shogun (Trivium album). (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 09:44, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

=[[Kirisute Gomen]]=

:{{la|Kirisute Gomen}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kirisute_Gomen Stats])

:({{Find sources|Kirisute Gomen}})

Does not appear to meet notability guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:55, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Could you be more specific? Uranium grenade (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash ^[talk] 05:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Redirect to Shogun (Trivium album) the album whence it comes. Lack of detailed reviews, didn't chart, so it's not notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:41, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
Redirect to Shogun (Trivium album). There are a good number of sources [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Kirisute+Gomen%22+Trivium&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&channel=fflb#q=%22Kirisute+Gomen%22+Trivium&hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&hs=FXi&tbo=d&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=fflb&tbs=ar:1&tbm=nws&ei=PX_3UP66CoPm8QTox4DABg&start=0&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.41018144,d.eWU&fp=e0165e01c7399818&biw=1366&bih=628 here], but as far as I can tell they are all unreliable, mention the song only in passing, or both. The song seems mostly to be noted for its online distribution, but this is already mentioned in the main article. --Cerebellum (talk) 04:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.