Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kittens Are Assholes
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Of note is that the !vote stating "good book title, but bas article title" was not considered for this close, because it does not provide a guideline or policy based rationale for deletion. NORTH AMERICA1000 17:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
=[[Kittens Are Assholes]]=
:{{la|Kittens Are Assholes}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Kittens Are Assholes}})
Fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG, no reliable source coverage that I could find through Google. Everymorning talk 18:49, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 18:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Topic doesn't merit an article at this time as it fails Wikipedia:Notability (books) and the general notability guideline. MJ94 (talk) 20:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete good book title, but bas article title. Legacypac (talk) 22:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I love the title, but this book just doesn't pass notability guidelines. There just isn't any coverage out there to show that this book is notable. It exists and can be purchased, but existing and availability do not give notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.