Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knox United SC

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 18:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Knox United SC]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Knox United SC}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Knox United SC}})

None of the sources establish notability (WP:GNG). Couldn't find any online either. ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 01:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:50, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

  • Keep - Per Simione001. Definetlyu has offline sources. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  • :any evidence of such? ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 23:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Delete: No evidence of notability, fails GNG and NORG. None of the sources in the article or found in BEFORE are WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. 05:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV. WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES is listed in {{section link|Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions|There must be sources}}. Keep voters must locate sources that demonstrate the topic passes GNG. Speculative statements are not convincing arguments. We need to see the evidence.4meter4 (talk) 15:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.