Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L&T Institute of Technology

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against redirect  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:27, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

=[[L&T Institute of Technology]]=

:{{la|L&T Institute of Technology}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/L%26T_Institute_of_Technology Stats])

:({{Find sources|L&T Institute of Technology}})

If I am interpreting this correctly, the entire college serves 120 students (40 seats per course). The article has zero sources, so I felt it would be worth seeing if we should keep it. CorporateM (Talk) 23:01, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Keep - under the same logic as WP:NHS. Uberaccount (talk) 01:19, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete Per the article it provides "..application oriented technical education. It is primarily meant for the benefit of the wards of the employees of Larsen & Toubro and its subsidiary companies." It sounds like a technical training school operated by a manufacturing company rather than what we generally think of as a college, so no "inherent notability for high schools" (which it clearly isn't) or colleges applies. Not every institute which calls itself a college really is one. Adequate references to establish notability have not been thus far identified. Edison (talk) 04:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Delete as per Edison. I don't believe NHS applies here, as it is a technical school with a very narrow focus. That said, would a redirect to the parent corporation be in order? UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 18:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.