Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let's read a book book

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Let's read a book book}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Let%27s_read_a_book_book Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Let's read a book book}})

No references. Too little context to be able to verify after-the-fact. No indication of notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:33, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

• Draftify as it seems to be the start of an article based on a section of a kowiki article [https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%8A%90%EB%82%8C%ED%91%9C_(%ED%85%94%EB%A0%88%EB%B9%84%EC%A0%84_%ED%94%84%EB%A1%9C%EA%B7%B8%EB%9E%A8)#%EC%B1%85%EC%B1%85%EC%B1%85_%EC%B1%85%EC%9D%84_%EC%9D%BD%EC%9D%8D%EC%8B%9C%EB%8B%A4!]. Also seems to be one of about a half dozen recently created enwiki pages on Korean TV topics that could do with further incubation and/or attention. Bakazaka (talk) 08:27, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

::Changing to Delete after further investigation. This article and several other drafts were created by a student without the oversight of the instructor, and the class has now concluded. Very little will be lost if the article is simply deleted, and other drafts about more notable topics will still be around if the student wants to continue to edit the encyclopedia. Bakazaka (talk) 08:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

• I am leaning towards delete. This article has no references. The article says the program was abolished due to poor viewing figures, and then revived, but only kept for approximately three years. Vorbee (talk) 08:56, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 09:22, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 09:22, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

• Userfy if the article creator agrees to that. This article was only created today and lacks some significant information that one would expect to find in an article about a TV series. If someone actually plans to improve it, it might be worth keeping after it is significantly improved. But if nobody plans to improve it, it should be deleted. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:31, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Looking at the history of the article, I see the creator of the article has a name in red letters, meaning that the author of the article does not have a user page as yet.Vorbee (talk) 09:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

:That shouldn't affect the decision here. Neither User:Seoryoung nor any other editor is required to have a user page if they don't want one. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

I appreciate that, but I want to know what the above Wikipedian means by "Userfy". Did this mean putting the article on the editor's user page? This would be difficult, in fact, not possible, if the editor does not have a user-page. Also, it would be difficult to leave messages on the talk page of the editor's user-page, meaning it would be difficult to see whether the article's creator agrees to any proposals discussed here. Vorbee (talk) 17:36, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

:See Wikipedia:Userfication. By "Userfy", I mean that the article could be moved to a subpage of the editor's userpage, that is, User:Seoryoung/Let's read a book book. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:21, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

• Delete the kowiki link is enough for it to survive speedy deletion, but that article doesn't suggest that this segment is notable. No sources and the current article doesn't even establish context. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:40, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.