Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ling Jun Wang
=[[Ling Jun Wang]]=
:{{la|Ling Jun Wang}} – (
:({{Find sources|Ling Jun Wang}})
No evidence of WP:NOTABILITY, fluff piece to support pushing a fringe view at Extinction (astronomy). Ian.thomson (talk) 14:10, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Unable to find sufficient in-depth reliable sources for WP:GNG or sufficient evidence of impact on the field for WP:PROF. - 2/0 (cont.) 05:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Same reasons as above. - Parejkoj (talk) 17:09, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:13, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. His papers don't have the citations to pass WP:PROF#C1 and I don't see any evidence of the other criteria either. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:14, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 17:36, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.