Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Cara Delevingne's modelling appearances

:{{la|List of Cara Delevingne's modelling appearances}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Cara_Delevingne%27s_modelling_appearances Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|List of Cara Delevingne's modelling appearances}})

This list of modelling appearances by Cara Delevingne is not notable. It is sufficient to summarize her work as a model in her biographical article. The Fashion Model Directory, which lists all of her work in the industry, is linked at the bottom of her article for anyone who would like a more detailed overview. Littlecarmen (talk) 13:24, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

• Delete: per WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Vrac (talk) 13:52, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Vrac.Pincrete (talk) 13:54, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Article is started by a User:CaraDele which I presume to be just a SPA-looking fan (because the real Delevingne should be busy touring for Paper Towns) also having a sandbox draft of Delevingne's main article. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 15:35, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
• Delete per above - Obvs not a dir. –Davey2010^Talk 18:48, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

:*Userfy - As atrocious as this is I kinda agree that this shouldn't go to waste, I would strongly suggest tho that {{u|CaraDele}} improves this to the point where it's totally different from what it is now - If it gets shoved back in to article space within a week then this'll be deleted and probably rather quickly so I suggest CD makes this amazing! –Davey2010^Talk 22:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

• Delete per above, WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Rubbish computer 01:44, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
• So it looks like your going to delete it but it took me ages to do all that, could I put it on the main page? CaraDele (talk) 17:30, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
• Userfy per User:CaraDele's request. Obviously fails policies like WP:NOTDIRECTORY but, equally obviously, was hard work to create. I highly doubt the editor will use it improperly, and I understand Wikipedia isn't a free web host, but this was done in good faith and there's no reason to put the editor's hard work to waste. North of Eden (talk) 22:46, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
• Userfy per User:CaraDele's request, no reason for the work to go to waste.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
• Userfy per {{u|Davey2010}}'s reasoning —Мандичка^YO 😜 15:49, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.