Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of things widely considered toyetic

Subjective, POV, weasel words in the title. Delete. Kaibabsquirrel 15:59, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Inherently POV and unverifiable. Pburka 16:06, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep neologisms from Freakazoid Delete subjective, divisive lists. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 17:37, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as above, listcruft. Punkmorten 23:19, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - irrelevant. Would be actually "list of cartoon characters" or something like that since toy manufacturers have attempted to turn most of them into some kind of toys. Quality controversial... - Skysmith 10:14, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. For better or worse, this is both a part of marketing history and animation history. The latter has been oftentimes accused (rightfully, at times) of creating stuff merely just for the sake of having a toy to market. Likewise, marketers have been accused of taking the most innocent stuff and creating mercenary merchandizing licenses out of it. It's somewhat of a dark footnote in what passes as (recent) modern history (though others may disagree), and I think it should be retained.--Mitsukai 00:11, 9 August 2005 (UTC)Delete. In retrospect, A Man in Black has a point. I'll go ahead and move over some of the examples to the toyetic article and this one can be deleted.--Mitsukai 12:59, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• This seems to be more of an argument to expand toyetic than an argument to expand a POV list. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 12:49, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.