Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of writing systems by adoption

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of writing systems. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[List of writing systems by adoption]]=

:{{la|List of writing systems by adoption}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_writing_systems_by_adoption Stats])

:({{Find sources|List of writing systems by adoption}})

I think this list might fail WP:GNG, but I could be wrong. The entire article is original research, too. SarahStierch (talk) 04:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

If the list isn't rewritten from scratch (with actual references rather than original research), I would favor deleting it. Kaldari (talk) 04:59, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Merge to List of writing systems. The information on number of users should be included in the other article. Borock (talk) 05:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:51, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Comment It has sources. Why does it fail GNG and OR? -- Green Cardamom (talk) 01:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:13, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Comment The title is very odd: surely this is a "List of writing systems by number of users". --Colapeninsula (talk) 19:06, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Redirect to list of writing systems. Seems to be a lot of original research, other than the reliable information that already appears at another list. If someone wants to add information about users to the writing systems list, that would work just fine. Vcessayist (talk) 00:56, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 15:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 15:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 04:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Merge to List of writing systems per Borock. LogicalCreator (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:44, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Merge per others. WP:LISTN requires that the subject of the list be covered as a group in reliable sources, and I can't myself find anything that treats writing systems by adoption as a group of things. --Batard0 (talk) 16:28, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Merge to List of writing systems if there's anything of value to merge, redirect if there isn't.--xanchester (t) 23:55, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Merge to List of writing systems. — ΛΧΣ21™ 04:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.