Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Zodiacs
=[[Los Zodiacs]]=
More band vanity. Delete <drini ☎> 06:12, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, the term "band vanity" should only be applied to non-notable bands. Kappa 09:45, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- PS Thanks for translating the article Drini. Kappa 10:01, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. If what the article seems to be saying about them pioneering rock/ballads and appearing regularly on two channels is correct, then they're certainly notable. It would be nice, though, if we had someone familiar with the Peruvian music scene around to confirm/deny their notability. They only get 160 Google hits, but that doesn't necessarily mean very much when talking about a Peruvian band that was big thirty years ago... If it is kept then it will clearly need a great deal of cleanup and work, which is another problem given the difficulty of getting information about them. Still, even if it was almost exclusively in one country, a band that has had genuine influence and exposure does deserve to be on Wikipedia. Aquillion 11:16, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
There aren't any articles on Allmusic.com about this band nor any English articles available through Google. Delete as unverifiable unless evidence presented of band.
Keep and expand given some evidence. Unfortunately no source documents in English
Capitalistroadster 11:41, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - Came up with over 15,000 hits in google. -GregNorc (talk) 19:01, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Actually it's not that easy to find relevant hits, but there are some, like [http://www.boletindenewyork.com/lanuevaola.htm] [http://lmiguel52.tripod.com/id8.html] [http://galeon.hispavista.com/mostros/aficiones591660.html] - basically all discussing the history of Peruvian rock and mentioning them. Kappa 20:12, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- I got about 166 hits. [http://www.google.com/search?en&q=%22Los+Zodiacs%22] Perhaps you forgot to include quotes? Aquillion 06:44, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.